Bryce Edwards: The Uffindell scandal raises big questions about integrity in National

Bryce Edwards: The Uffindell scandal raises big questions about integrity in National

National is dripping “blue blood” again. The revelations over Sam Uffindell’s violent assault indicate that the National Party under Christopher Luxon hasn’t quite shed the toxicity and internal damage of the last few years.

The crises besetting the party have recently been well documented in journalist Andrea Vance’s new book “Blue Blood: The Inside Story of the National Party in Crisis”, but the party had hoped that the internal turmoil and scandal of those years had been left behind. This was a particular aim of the party’s successful weekend conference – to show that under new management, the party’s culture had changed. But that message has been undermined by this scandal and, once again, National faces serious questions about its integrity and culture.

The facts about the Uffindell scandal

The facts don’t look good for the MP in question or the party as a whole. Sam Uffindell was involved in an ugly beating of a fellow student when he was at King’s College in 1999. He was 16, and the victim was 13. Uffindell was forced to leave the prestigious private school.

Uffindell apologised to the victim last year, when he was the Chair of the National Party’s Papamoa branch. He then put himself forward this year for the National’s candidacy in the Tauranga by-election. He informed the party selection panel of this ugly episode from his past, but he didn’t inform the public.

The victim has now come forward with the story of the beating and the apology, and suggests he has been used for political advantage. Uffindell is fronting up to media outlets for interviews expressing remorse. The MP and his party will be hoping to draw a line under the controversy and move on. But the matter does raise some important questions.

Should politicians be punished for the crimes of their youth?

Some will see this scandal as unfair and irrelevant, believing Uffindell should be judged on his record as an adult, or at least the totality of his life rather than what Uffindell now admits is “the biggest mistake of his life”. Some believe in the possibility of redemption and argue a serious mistakes a person makes in their youth shouldn’t necessarily prevent them from becoming a politician 23 years later.

This defence of Uffindell is coming today from some interesting places. Leftwing blogger Martyn Bradbury has suggested that the condemnation of the rightwing MP is over the top: “I can’t believe we are wasting time on crucifying a new MP for something he did when he was 16. Look, I can’t stand National MPs at the best of times, and it pains me to defend one, but the mistakes a child makes can’t be held over them forever. Uffindell has gone on to make a contribution to his community, to his society and to his Whānau, attempting to hold this act up for political purposes is cheap and lazy.”

Bradbury says that Uffindell’s crimes shouldn’t be minimised, but the left shouldn’t be seeking to capitalise on them either: “I get that we on the Left are having some polling lows right now, but hanging someone for a childhood crime and praying that virtue signalling makes us more electable is a giant mistake.”

Similarly, BusinessDesk editor Pattrick Smellie says the story “can be seen as a leak designed to deflect from a bad poll for the government”. Although he condemns Uffindell’s behaviour, Smellie also believes it won’t have much negative impact: “it is unlikely to be more than a bump in the road for National at this point in the electoral cycle.”

Is the National Party still selecting candidates of low integrity?

One of the leading contributors to National’s dire reputation in recent years has been the party’s selection of candidates with poor character. There have been seriously damaging scandals involving the likes of Jami-Lee Ross, Todd Barclay, Hamish Walker, Andrew Falloon, and Jake Bezzant. A consensus emerged that National’s candidate selection process was seriously flawed. In its obsession with trying to find the “next John Key” the party was erroneously bringing in ambitious young narcissistic and morally-questionable candidates.

In the wake of the 2020 election loss, the party even commissioned an independent report on this problem, which recommended an overhaul of candidate selection and pointed to problems in the party’s culture. A major attempt to improve standards was supposedly undertaken. But has it worked?

What’s more, given the serious problems of bullying in Parliament, the selection of someone who has form for violence seems remarkably questionable.

Why did National and Uffindell keep the misdemeanour hidden?

There will always be politicians who make mistakes, or have problematic pasts. The question is whether they are transparent and upfront about their failings. And there’s always the risk that the “cover-up” is worse than “the crime”.

There is no doubt that Uffindell was upfront to his own party selection committee when he sought the Tauranga nomination. There may be questions about whether they knew the full extent of the misdemeanour, but it’s clear they knew about the 1999 attack and failed to get the candidate to be publicly honest about it.

This was a key mistake. National Party blogger David Farrar says today that if he had been on the selection committee, he would’ve insisted that Uffindell disclosed the incident publicly. He argues that it is always best to front foot these things and pre-empt your opponents opportunity to seize upon something negative and use it to define a politician.

In fact, Farrar suggests Uffindell could have made a speech about the lessons of his past: “Imagine how powerful it would have been if Uffindell gave a speech (maybe even his maiden) on bullying at schools and said the reason it is a topic dear to him isn’t because he was bullied at school, but because he once bullied and assaulted a student and how he has always regretted it and reflected on the impact it would have had, and how he wants to send a message to students to be better than he was, and to reject bullying.”

Nonetheless, some of Uffindell’s constituents will feel they have been misled by him. Such a declaration surely had to come before voting took place. Notably, Uffindell says he stands by his decision not to inform voters before his election.

Has Uffindell been hypocritical?

The new MP has only been in Parliament for a week, and already he has positioned himself as an opponent of lawlessness and violence. In his maiden speech last week, he lamented “a growing culture of lawlessness, lack of accountability, a sense of impunity, and significant underlying generational social problems”. That now seems highly ironic, if not hypocritical.

The victim of the 1999 attack also feels that Uffindell may have only apologised to him out of political expediency and his desire to be an MP. Given the timing, it’s not hard to reach the same conclusion.

What happens now?

Whether Uffindell can survive this scandal probably depends on whether there is more to come out. He insists that he has now been entirely transparent and, if that is indeed the case, the public might be willing to accept Uffindell’s current apologies, which are coming across as sincere and cut him some slack for something he did as a child.

The ball is now in the National Party’s court. Uffindell has fronted and explained himself. The focus now needs to go on the National officials who have been party to what can be seen as a “cover up”. In particular, the nine members of National’s selection committee should explain why they selected Uffindell but did not make him declare his past to the Tauranga electorate.

National’s opponents will need to tread carefully in dealing with this scandal. Other parties will likely have some similarly negative skeletons in their closets, that are already known within Wellington’s beltway. At the moment New Zealand politics has a culture in which politicians’ private lives are viewed by opponents are mostly “off limits” in terms of partisan competition. But this “gentlemen’s agreement” not to weaponise failings in MPs’ personal and family lives will very quickly be broken if National feels targeted by Labour and the Greens over the Uffindell scandal.


Dr Bryce Edwards is Political Analyst in Residence at Victoria University of Wellington. He is the director of the Democracy Project.

This article can be republished under a Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0  license. Attributions should include a link to the Democracy Project.  


Further reading on the National Party and Sam Uffindell

Karl du Fresne: The Uffindell affair and what it tells us about National
Ireland Hendry-Tennent (Newshub): Patrick Gower says National, Sam Uffindell misled voters by not publicly disclosing violent assault during Tauranga by-election
Claire Trevett (Herald): Sam Uffindell’s skeletons now Christopher Luxon’s problem(paywalled)
Adam Pearse (Herald): National MP Sam Uffindell kept quiet over violent high school attack, expecting byelection reveal
David Farrar: The Uffindell mistake (paywalled)
Jacqui Van Der Kaay (Democracy Project): Personal integrity in politics
Martyn Bradbury (Daily Blog): Groan – In defence of Sam bloody Uffindell
Toby Manhire (Spinoff): Uffindell assault revelation raises fresh questions over National selection ‘errors’
Ireland Hendry-Tennent (Newshub): National MP Sam Uffindell defends not revealing violent assault when asked ‘his biggest regret’ during Tauranga by-election

Ireland Hendry-Tennent (Newshub): Sam Uffindell won’t reveal if any National MPs knew about his violent past, believes his punishment was ‘sufficient’
RNZ: National Party stands by MP Sam Uffindell after high school assault comes to light
Curwen Ares Rolinson (Daily Blog): On National’s Uffindell and the lack of a statute of limitations in politics
Isobel Ewing (Newshub): National MP Sam Uffindell asked to leave Auckland’s King’s College after violent nighttime attack on younger student
Duncan Garner (NBR): Luxon is no Key and ‘same old, same old’ won’t cut it (paywalled)
Aaron Hendry (Newsroom): Punitive measures won’t help our young people
RNZ: Luxon hits back, defending National’s lambasted welfare policy
Imogen Wells (Newshub): National’s benefit sanctions will result in either ‘crime or hungry people’, warns welfare advocate
Waatea News: Luxon keen to outsource job scheme to iwi
RNZ: Māori electorates: National Party to stand candidate in Tāmaki Makaurau at election
David Farrar: An excellent policy from National
RNZ: National’s welfare plan over-simplified and out of touch, opposing parties say

Other items of interest and importance today

1News: Latest poll to create ‘ripples’ behind scenes for Labour
1News: Seymour explains why ACT topped minor parties in latest poll
Toby Manhire (Spinoff): The crucial number in TVNZ’s new poll
RNZ: National down but still leads in 1 News / Kantar political poll
Martyn Bradbury (Daily Blog): TVNZ Poll: Winners, Losers & Predictions

Andrea Vance (Stuff): NZ ministers failing to meet Cabinet paper public release deadlines
Chris Trotter (Daily Blog): Crossing the line: What lies behind the surge to Te Pāti Māori?
Sharon Brettkelly (RNZ): Why are we suspicious of centralisation?
Pattrick Smellie (BusinessDesk): Smellie Sniffs the Breeze: on Labour’s chances(paywalled)
Johnny Blades (RNZ): Words galore – the work of Hansard

Tim Murphy (Newsroom): Jami-Lee: ‘I got f***ed over big time’
Catrin Owen (Stuff): Simon Bridges ‘had to beg’ Jami-Lee Ross not to leave National after demotion
Craig Kapitan (Herald): National and Labour donations trial: Jami-Lee Ross’ police interview played in court
Lucy Thomson (Newshub): Jami-Lee Ross told police he secretly recorded Simon Bridges because he could smell ‘political danger’

Tom Pullar-Strecker (Stuff): NZ could ‘easily slip into recession’ if tourism and education slow to rebound
1News: Kiwis outlook on economy remains pessimistic – new poll
Kirsty Johnston (Stuff): ‘Blatant exploitation’: Migrant workers packed in freezing, damp rooms for $150 a week
Vita Molyneux (Herald): Body camera child poverty study reveals ‘shameful’ extent of problem
Daniel Smith (Stuff): Younger workers do not want to ‘sell their soul’ to workplace
Mike Yardley (Stuff): Bolder changes needed to tackle ‘welfarism’ across age groups
Justin Lester (Spinoff): The rise of New Zealand’s middle class millionaires
Tulia Thompson (Spinoff): Fighting for fair: How the pay gap is still stifling Māori and Pacific workers
Jenée Tibshraeny (Herald): Nation of Debt: How problematic is NZ’s pile of govt debt?(paywalled)
Liam Dann (Herald): Record low Māori unemployment something to celebrate(paywalled)
John Roughan (Herald): The outdated notion of universal benefits (paywalled)
Maryana Garcia (Herald): Bay of Plenty beneficiaries increases by 40 per cent over five years as recruiters struggle (paywalled)
Janine Starks (Stuff): Time to compensate women for time out of workforce

RNZ: Auditor-General urges accountability changes for three waters reforms
Bernard Hickey: The fundamental problem with Three Waters
Glenn McConnell (Stuff): Auditor-General raises concerns about accountability in Three Waters plan
Brent Edwards (NBR): Government’s Three Waters reforms questioned by Auditor-General (paywalled)
Gerry Brownlee (Herald): How would Christchurch’s flooding woes be managed under a new water authority?

Cherie Howie (Herald): Kiwi nurse shortage: Australia has more nurses than New Zealand, health figures show (paywalled)
Paula Bennett (Herald): Andrew Little’s health plan will not retain nursing workforce(paywalled)
Kushlan Sugathapala (Herald): Closing gaps need more than healthcare reforms(paywalled)
Rachel Smalley (NBR): No comment, no accountability (paywalled)
Andrew Gunn (Stuff): Coming soon, to a fictional hospital near you
Cate Macintosh (Stuff): Unrelenting pressure on health services expected to continue for up to five more weeks
Imran Ali (Herald): Whangārei Hospital down half its trainee surgeons – situation critical union warns

Lee Kenny (Stuff): One in three first-year polytech students quit in the first 12 months
Richard Harman: The mysterious missing $689,000 public servant (paywalled)
Brent Edwards (NBR): More questions than answers about poytechnics merger(paywalled)
Richard Prebble (Herald): Issuing bogus NCEA credits cannot be the answer(paywalled)
Emma Vitz (Spinoff): What’s really behind the ‘truancy crisis’?

Anne Gibson (Herald): Specialist Ray White agent on mortgagee sales: ‘Rising numbers are coming’
RNZ: Average house price drops below $1m, down 4.9% in past three months
Sam Sachdeva (Newsroom): ‘Insult to injury’: Missing data undermines emergency housing trial
Trish Austin (Herald): The tragically wrong Housing Enabling Supply Bill (paywalled)
Geraden Cann (Stuff): Hundreds of Wellington first-home buyers who bought at market peak now in negative equity
Brent Melville (BusinessDesk): Wellington house price decline ‘worst in world’(paywalled)
Brigitte Morten (NBR): Housing supply a wobbly plank for October local body elections(paywalled)
Kate MacNamara (Herald): Kāinga Ora’s ‘huge upfront payment’ clinched its purchase of Ferncliffe Farms (paywalled)
Hayden Donnell (Spinoff): Auckland Council makes its last stand against a better world

Thomas Manch (Stuff): Nanaia Mahuta and China’s Wang Yi didn’t discuss ‘specifics’ of Taiwan tensions
Thomas Manch (Stuff): New Zealand to sign ‘strategic partnership’ with Malaysia
Sam Sachdeva (Newsroom): The CCP versus China’s ‘multiverse’
Torika Tokalau (Stuff): Defence minister leads delegation to mark 80th anniversary of Battle of Guadalcanal